DTAC filed the fivepoint case against CAT and the state agency's board on April 25 in connection with the deals. The court last month accepted for judicial review only the first point, prompting DTAC to petition to the Central Administrative Court to accept the other four points too.
The first point in the complaint is DTAC's request for a court order to terฌminate the resolutions of the CAT board on January 14 allowing CAT to enter the deals for collaboration on 3G service development.
The other four points are its requests for a court order that CAT and the board stop honouring the deals and terminate them, while CAT must provide 3GHSPA (highspeed packet access) service on its 850megahertz spectrum on its own and act in accorฌdance with the 1992 PublicPrivate Joint Venture.
DTAC has said that the deals show CAT's discriminatory treatment against other operators by giving opportunity to only one operator to provide 3G services and has not prescribed the process to allow other operators to parฌticipate. The deals would result in a monopoly of the HSPA market.
Moreover, it says that the deals are not in compliance with Section 46 of the Frequency Act BE 2553, the StatePrivate Participation Act BE 2535 and the competition law.
CAT and True executives have said the deals were developed in compliance with all related law.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น